LOCALITY AND GLOBALITY: ESTIMATIONS OF THE ENCRYPTION COLLECTIVITIES

Cristian Lupu, Tudor Niculiu, Eduard Franţi

2006

Abstract

In this paper we try to define a collectivity, to model and to measure it. Because N. Bourbaki names ”collectivizing relation” the relation defining a set, we name collectivities only the sets selected or built by the help of the relations. The orthogonal interconnections model very well the collectivities. The behavior (structural self-organization) around the origin is different for homogenous and non-homogenous interconnections. How can we measure this behavior? A way is by locality and globality. The locality measures analytically by neighborhoods, neighborhood reserves, Moore reserves and synthetically by diameters, degrees, average distances. The globality is the behavior of an interconnection around a property. The globality vs. symmetry measures by the compactity, efficiency and interconnecting filling. The locality and the globality are among primary manifestations of the self-organization. In this way, collectivities modeled by self-organizing interconnections can contribute to changing our fundamental view of computers by trying to bring them nearer to the nature.

References

  1. Akers, S. B. and Krishnamurthy, B. (1989). A group - theoretic model for symmetric interconnection networks. IEEE Trans. on Computers, 38(4):555-566.
  2. Castro, L. D. and Zuben, F. V. (2005). Recent Developments in Biologically Inspired Computing. Idea Group Publishing, Brazil.
  3. Dra?ga?nescu, M. (1985). Ortophysics (in Romanian). Editura S¸tiin¸tifica? s¸i Enciclopedica?, Bucures¸ti.
  4. Duato, J., Yalamanchili, S., and Ni, L. (1997). Interconnection Networks. An Engineering Approach. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California.
  5. Lupu, C. (2002). Generalized hyper structures and interconnection locality. Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5(4):365-382.
  6. Lupu, C. (2004a). Interconnecting. Locality and Symmetry in Computers Orthogonal Networks (in Romanian). Editura Tehnica?, Bucures¸ti.
  7. Lupu, C. (2004b). Locality measured by contour patterns, a topographic model. In Hamza, M. H., editor, Proceedings of the 15th IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation, pages 50-54, Marina Del Rey, California, USA. ACTA Press.
  8. Lupu, C., Firtat, B., and Enoiu, C. (2005). Cryptography methods using the rsa algorithm. WSEAS Transactions on Communications, 4(4):153-156.
  9. Lupu, C. and Niculiu, T. (2005). Interconnection locality and group locality. In Proc. of the EUROCON 2005, pages 656-659, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro.
  10. Nemoianu, V. (1967). The Structuralism (in Romanian). Editura pentru Literatura? Universala?, Bucures¸ti.
  11. Zhuge, H. (2005). The future interconnection environment. IEEE Computer, 38(4):27-33.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lupu C., Niculiu T. and Franţi E. (2006). LOCALITY AND GLOBALITY: ESTIMATIONS OF THE ENCRYPTION COLLECTIVITIES . In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO, ISBN 978-972-8865-60-3, pages 486-493. DOI: 10.5220/0001205404860493


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco06,
author={Cristian Lupu and Tudor Niculiu and Eduard Franţi},
title={LOCALITY AND GLOBALITY: ESTIMATIONS OF THE ENCRYPTION COLLECTIVITIES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO,},
year={2006},
pages={486-493},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0001205404860493},
isbn={978-972-8865-60-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 2: ICINCO,
TI - LOCALITY AND GLOBALITY: ESTIMATIONS OF THE ENCRYPTION COLLECTIVITIES
SN - 978-972-8865-60-3
AU - Lupu C.
AU - Niculiu T.
AU - Franţi E.
PY - 2006
SP - 486
EP - 493
DO - 10.5220/0001205404860493