INNOVATION BY COLLABORATION AMONG FIRMS. A NEW METHODOLOGY - Building Theory from Case Study Research and Simulation Models
Paola Pisano
2010
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to introduce a methodology known as “multi agent systems” (MAS) and show how it could serve not only a similar purpose when compared to cases by using virtual artefacts instead of real world observations, but also overcome the limitation of case study process. Besides being used for creating new theory, this approach is also effective for teaching and transmitting knowledge in a “maieutical” way, through experimentation on the model and cause-effect analysis of results. After describing the paradigm itself, and how it, along with simulation, can be used in social domains, it will be shown how it could interface the conceptual flow typical of case study analysis. Particular attention will be devoted to the interactivity deriving from the way in which this methodology is conceived, allowing researchers to perform “scenario analysis”, i.e.: a process of analyzing future occurrences by considering alternative possible outcomes, after the baseline experiments obtained through the model have given positive results. In the second part of the paper a case study is presented, obtained by employing MAS methodology. It aims to study enterprise collaboration formation and modification: the goal is to study how innovation management and sharing could bring to non-equity link formation among them. The model is introduced in detail and qualitative results are analyzed, by deriving general concepts from them. Last, some points of strength and weaknesses of this methodology are briefly underlined.
References
- Abbott, A. 1988. Workshop on sequence methods. National Science Foundation Conference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin.
- Bonabeau E. ,2001. Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Icosystem Corporation, 545 Concord Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138.
- Bettenhausen, K., & Murnighan, J. K.,1986. The emergence of norms in competitive decision-making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, p.350- 372.
- Coleman, J., 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95.
- Evolution, Yin, Robert K., 1998: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
- Gersick, C. ,1988.Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, p.9-41.
- Grandori, A. ,1997. An organizational assessment of interfirm coordination modes. Organization Studies, 18 (6), p.897.Grandori, A., Soda, G. 1995. Inter-firm networks: Antecedents, mechanisms and forms. Organization Studies, 16 (2), p.183.
- Granovetter, Mark S. 1973.The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6) 1360-1380.
- Huberman, A. M., 1984.Qualitative data analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Jick, T. ,1979.Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp. 602-611.
- Kadushin, C,Delmos J.,1992. Social Networks and Urban Neighboorhoods in New York City.City & Society 6(1):58-75.
- Miles, M.,1979.Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp.590-601.
- Mintzberg, H.,1979.An emerging strategy of "direct" research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp.580-589.
- Nisbett, R., & Ross, L.,1980.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Pettigrew, A.,1988.Longitudinal field research on change: Theory and practice. National Science Foundation Conference on Longitudinal Research Methods in Organizations, Austin.
- Phlippen, S., Riccaboni M., 2007. Radical Innovation and Network evolution, the effect of genomic revolution of the evolution of pharmaceutical R&D network.
- Podolny, J.M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market.American Journal of Sociology, 107: pp.33-60.
- Quinn, J. B.,1980. Strategies for change. Homewood. IL: Dow-Jones Irwin.
- Remondino M., Correndo G., 2006. MABS Validation Through Repeated Execution and Data Mining Analysis, International Journal of SIMULATION: Systems, Science & Technology (IJS3T) 7,
- Shan, W., Walker, G. and Kogut, B.,1994. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 387.
- Vagnani, M, 2009. The Black-Scholes model as a determinant of the implied volatility smile: A simulation study, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Volume 72, issue 1, pp. 103-118.
- Woolridge, M., & Jennings, N.,1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge. Engineering Review ,10(2) p.115-152.
- Van Maanen, J.,1988.Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A.,1973.On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, p.237-251.
- Yin, R.,1984,.Case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Paper Citation
in Harvard Style
Pisano P. (2010). INNOVATION BY COLLABORATION AMONG FIRMS. A NEW METHODOLOGY - Building Theory from Case Study Research and Simulation Models . In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-674-024-5, pages 106-113. DOI: 10.5220/0002790701060113
in Bibtex Style
@conference{csedu10,
author={Paola Pisano},
title={INNOVATION BY COLLABORATION AMONG FIRMS. A NEW METHODOLOGY - Building Theory from Case Study Research and Simulation Models},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,},
year={2010},
pages={106-113},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002790701060113},
isbn={978-989-674-024-5},
}
in EndNote Style
TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU,
TI - INNOVATION BY COLLABORATION AMONG FIRMS. A NEW METHODOLOGY - Building Theory from Case Study Research and Simulation Models
SN - 978-989-674-024-5
AU - Pisano P.
PY - 2010
SP - 106
EP - 113
DO - 10.5220/0002790701060113