The Capabilities Approach as a Lifelong Competency Assessment Framework

Merija Jirgensons

2015

Abstract

The Capabilities Approach is an interdisciplinary tool that is applicable in a number of settings. The approach was developed by economist and philosopher Amartya Sen in his work with quality of life issues in India that led to the creation of the Human Development Index (HDI). Sen’s contribution is in the assessment of quality of life issues. For Sen, human well-being is as important a factor as traditional economic concepts such as GDP and cost-benefit analysis. Moreover, the Capabilities Approach moves beyond human capital theory that views human labor, education, and other activities as tandem to the GNP and instead, provides a human centered analytical concept. The framework helps planners to orientate projects, to measure the satisfaction of target groups, and promote accessibility and egalitarian resource distribution. The effectiveness of the capabilities approach is analyzed in terms of functionings. The dynamic interdisciplinary character of the approach has allowed to be applied as an analytical tool to a number of disciplines. The author argues that the capabilities approach is also applicable to education in a lifelong competency-based learning context that offers a feasible alternative pathway to adult learners by addressing issues of quality, personal aspirations and satisfactions that make education and life worthwhile. Sen’s approach has been criticized for being incomplete. Yet its contribution is undeniable. The Capabilities Approach highlights particular spaces for evaluating individual opportunities and successes that are particularly applicable to a lifelong learning context.

References

  1. Alkire, S. (2005), Instrumental Freedoms and Human Capabilities, Draft Paper, pp. 1-14. https:// www.msu.edu/unit/phl/devconference/AlkireInstrume ntal%20Freedoms.pdf (Retrieved 11/2/2015).
  2. Delors, J. Chairman, (1996) Learning: The Treasure Within: Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the twenty-first century, Paris, UNESCO.
  3. Delors, J. (2013) 'The treasure within: Learning to know, learning to do, learning to live together and learning to be.78 What is the value of that treasure 15 years after its publication?78 International Review of Education, 59:319-330, DOI 10.1007/s11159-013-9350-8, pp. 319-330.
  4. ERI SEE, Blog A Historical Perspective of Life Long Learning by Ejvis Gishti (December 23, 2009) http://blog.erisee.org/articles/2009/12/a-historicalperspective-of-lifelong-learning/ (retrieved 17/7/2014).
  5. Europa: Summaries of EU legislation (2006) Key Comptences (sic) for Lifelong Learning, available at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/education_trai ning_youth/lifelong_learning/c11090_en.htm (retrieved 24/7/2014).
  6. Fain, P. (2015) Experimenting with Competency Inside Higher Ed, January 13, 2015 https:// www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/01/13/fedsmove-ahead-experimental-sites-competency-basededucation (retrieved January 13, 2015).
  7. Hatakka, M and Lagsten, J. (2012) The capability approach as a tool for development evaluation - analyzing students' use of internet resources Information Technology for Development, 18: 1, January, pp. 23- 41.
  8. Jirgensons, M. (2015) Direct Assessment Initiatives within a Lifelong learning Context, Procedia Computer Science, pp. 141-146, DOI 10.1016/j. procs.2014.12.019.
  9. Leßmann, O. and Bonvin, J-M. (2011) Job-satisfaction in the Broader Framework of the Capability Approach Management Revue, 22: 1, pp. 84-99 http://www.jstor.org/stable/41783672 (Retrieved: 08/11/2014).
  10. Lozano, J. Boni, A. Peris, J. and Hueso, A. (2012) Competencies in Higher Education: A Critical Analysis from the Capabilities Approach Journal of Philosophy of Education 46: 1, pp. 132-147.
  11. Lumina Foundation, The Degree Qualification Profile (DQP) 2.0: Draft report, January 2014, available at http://www.luminafoundation.org/publications/DQP/D QP2.0-draft.pdf (retrieved 24/7/2014).
  12. Nussbaum, M. (2000) Women and Human Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. OECD (May 2005) Definition and Selection of Key Competencies: Executive Summary, available at http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf (Retrieved 24/7/2014).
  14. OECD / OCDE (Revised December 2001), Definition and Selection of Competencies: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations: Background Paper, available at http://www.oecd.org/education/skills-beyondschool/41529556.pdf (Retrieved: 2/2/2015).
  15. Robeyns, I. (2006) The Capabilities Approach in Practice, Journal of Political Philosophy, 14:3, pp. 351-356.
  16. Robeyns, I. (2003) Sen's Capability Approach and Gender Inequality: Selecting Relevant Capabilities Feminist Economics 9:2-3, pp. 61-92.
  17. Saito, M. (2003) Amartya Sen's Capability Approach to Education: A Critical Exploration Journal of Philosophy of Education 37: 1, pp. 17-33.
  18. Sen, A. (2007) Capability and Well-Being in The Philosophy of Economics 3rd edition, Daniel M. Hausman (ed.) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 270-293.
  19. Sen, A. (1979) Equality of What? The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Delivered at Stanford University, May 22, 1979.
  20. Sen, A. (2010) The Idea of Justice, London: Penguin Group.
  21. Sen, A. (2010) Mobile and the World, Creative Commons http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/view/614/254.
  22. Tait, A. (2013) Distance and E-Learning, Social Justice, and Development: The Relevance of Capability Approaches to the Mission of Open Universities IRRODL No. 14 (Sept 2013), pp. 1-18.
  23. Terzi, L. (2007) The Capability to be Educated in Amartya Sen's Capability Approach and Social Justice in Education Melanie Walker and Elaine Unterhalter (eds.), New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 25-43.
  24. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (2014) Human Development Reports, Human Development Index (HDI). http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/humandevelopment-index-hdi (retrieved 24/1/2015).
  25. Unterhalter, E. Vaughan, R. and Walker, M. (2007) The Capability Approach and Education. Re-publication of article was published in Prospero, November 2007 for the Human Development and Capability Association (HDCA), http://www.capabilityapproach.com/ (retrieved 16/1/2015).
  26. Walker, M. (2010) Critical Capability Pedagogies and Higher Education Educational Philosophy and Theory 42: 8, pp. 898-917 DOI: 10.1111/j.1469- 5812.2007.00379.x.
  27. Walker, M. (2006) Higher Education Pedagogies, New York: Open University Press.
  28. Zheng, Y. (2009) Different Spaces for e-Development: What Can We Learn from the Capability Approach? Information Technology for Development, 15: 2, pp. 66-82, DOI: 10.1002/itdj.20115.
  29. Zheng, Y. and Stahl, B (2011) Technology, capabilities and critical perspectives: what can critical theory contribute to Sen's capability approach? Ethics and Information Technology, 13: January, pp. 69-80, DOI 10.1007/s10676-011-9264-8.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Jirgensons M. (2015). The Capabilities Approach as a Lifelong Competency Assessment Framework . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-107-6, pages 501-509. DOI: 10.5220/0005493205010509


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu15,
author={Merija Jirgensons},
title={The Capabilities Approach as a Lifelong Competency Assessment Framework},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2015},
pages={501-509},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005493205010509},
isbn={978-989-758-107-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - The Capabilities Approach as a Lifelong Competency Assessment Framework
SN - 978-989-758-107-6
AU - Jirgensons M.
PY - 2015
SP - 501
EP - 509
DO - 10.5220/0005493205010509