LQG/LTR Versus Smith Predictor Control for Discrete-time Systems with Delay

Dariusz Horla, Andrzej Krolikowski

2015

Abstract

A simple LQG control with no control cost is considered for discrete-time systems with input delay. In such case the loop transfer recovery (LTR) effect can be obtained especially for minimum-phase systems. The robustness of this control is analyzed and compared with state prediction control whose robustness stability is formulated via LMI. The robustness with respect to uncertain time-delay is considered including the control systems with Smith predictor-based controllers. Computer simulations of a second-order stable, unstable and nonminimum-phase systems with time-delay are given to illustrate the robustness and performance of the considered controllers.

References

  1. A. Kodjina, K. Uchida, F. S. and Ishijima, S. (1994). Robust stabilization of a system with delays in control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 39(8):1694-1698.
  2. Bobal, V., Chalupa, P., Dostal, P., and Novak, J. (2011). Simulation verification of digital self-tuning control of systems with time-delay. In Proc. IAESTED Int. Conf., pages CD ROM 66-71, Crete, Greece.
  3. Gonzales, A., Sala, A., and Albertos, P. (2012). Predictor based stabilization of discrete time-varying inputdelay systems. Automatica., 48(4):454-457.
  4. Kinnaert, M. (1990). Lqg/ltr technique for discrete-time systems with time-delays. In Proc. of the 20th Conference on Decision and Control, pages 1633-1634, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  5. Kinnaert, M. and Peng, Y. (1990). Discrete-time lqg/ltr technique for systems with time delays. Systems and Control Letters, 15:303-311.
  6. Kravaris, C. and Wright, R. (1989). Dead-time compensation for nonlinear processes. AIChE Journal, 35(9):1535-1542.
  7. Maciejowski, J. (1985). Asymptotic recovery for discretetime systems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 30(6):602-605.
  8. Soroush, M. and Kravaris, C. (1992). Discrete-time nonlinear controller synthesis by input/output linearization. AIChE Journal, 38(12):1923-1945.
  9. Tadjine, M., M'Saad, M., and Dugard, L. (1994). Discretetime compensators with loop transfer recovery. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 39(6):1259-1262.
  10. Zhang, Z. and Freudenberg, J. (1993). Discrete-time loop transfer recovery for systems with nonminimum phase zeros and time delays. Automatica, 29(2):351-365.
  11. Zongli, L. (2007). On asymptotic stabilizability of discretetime-linear systems with delayed input. Communications in Information and Systems., 7(3):227-264.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Horla D. and Krolikowski A. (2015). LQG/LTR Versus Smith Predictor Control for Discrete-time Systems with Delay . In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO, ISBN 978-989-758-122-9, pages 388-397. DOI: 10.5220/0005537003880397


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icinco15,
author={Dariusz Horla and Andrzej Krolikowski},
title={LQG/LTR Versus Smith Predictor Control for Discrete-time Systems with Delay},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,},
year={2015},
pages={388-397},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005537003880397},
isbn={978-989-758-122-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics - Volume 1: ICINCO,
TI - LQG/LTR Versus Smith Predictor Control for Discrete-time Systems with Delay
SN - 978-989-758-122-9
AU - Horla D.
AU - Krolikowski A.
PY - 2015
SP - 388
EP - 397
DO - 10.5220/0005537003880397