Usability and Engineering Aspects of Competing RF Technologies for Communication with Commercial Sports Sensors in Ubiquitous Applications - Experimental Comparison of Power Consumption and Use Cases for ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy Sensor Devices

Hans Weghorn

2015

Abstract

The commercial market offers quite some time already personal electronic sports tools for control and monitoring of physical workouts. With these units, body measures like movement speed, tread rates, and heart rate are detected by tiny autonomous sensor units and their recordings are transmitted via RF for further processing to a central handheld device. Since a while, also smartphone apps can be used as control instance, if their ubiquitous host device supports one of the particular RF standards for coupling them to the sports sensors. During the last decade, two competing wireless standards have evolved for this sensor air link, which are called ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy. The key features of this remote communication technology determine the usability within the various scenarios in personal sports, for instance the question how many sensor devices can be operated closely to each other without interference. In this paper, the specified and advertised properties are analysed on base of the definition of these RF standards, and they are furthermore practically verified with experiments. In particular, measurements of power consumption are shown for the two different RF systems, since life time of sensor battery has relevant impact on convenience of daily use. Furthermore, practical observations of various spurious effects when using the two RF standards are reported here, which seriously bring the reliability and accuracy of such commercial devices into question.

References

  1. Arts, F. J., Kuipers H., 1994. The relation between power output, oxygen uptake and heart rate in male athletes. Int. J. of Sports Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp228- 231.Moore, R., Lopes, J., 1999.
  2. Bluetooth SIG, https://developer.bluetooth.org/Develop mentResources/Pages/White-Papers.aspx, last access: April 2015
  3. Colagiuri, S., et al., 2010. The cost of overweight and obesity in Australia. Med J Aust, 192, 5 (March 2010), pp 260-264.
  4. Dynastream Innovations Inc., 2011. ANT message protocol and usage. Sourced from http://thisisant.com, Rev. 4.5. (2011)
  5. Hoppeler, H., Howald, H., Conley, K., Lindstedt, S. L., Claassen, H., Vock, P., Weibel, E. R., 1985. Endurance training in humans: aerobic capacity and structure of skeletal muscle. J. of Applied Physiology, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp 320-327.
  6. Weghorn, H., 2015.1. Application and UI Design for Ergonomic Heart Rate Monitoring in Endurance Sports: Realizing an Improved Tool for Health and Sports Activities on Base of Android Smartphone Programming and ANT+. In International Congress icSPORTS 2013, revised selected papers, CCIS 464, Springer Berlin, pp25-41. (2015)
  7. Weghorn, H., 2015.2. Efforts in Developing Android Smartphone Sports and Healthcare Apps based on Bluetooth Low Energy and ANT+ Communication Standards. In 15th International Conference on I4CS 2015 Innovations for Community Services, Nuremberg, Germany, pp106-112. (July 2015)
  8. Valentín, G., Howard, A. M., 2013. Dealing with Childhood Obesity: Passive versus Active Activity Monitoring Approaches for Engaging Individuals in Exercise. In Proceedings BRC 2013 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, February 2013).
  9. Varta Microbattery Inc., 2015. Primary Lithium Cells, Technical Handbook, sourced from http://www.vartamicrobattery.com, last access: August 2015
  10. Wannamethee, G, Shaper, A. G., 1992. Physical activity and stroke in British middle aged men. British Medical Journal, 304 (March 1992), pp597-601.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Weghorn H. (2015). Usability and Engineering Aspects of Competing RF Technologies for Communication with Commercial Sports Sensors in Ubiquitous Applications - Experimental Comparison of Power Consumption and Use Cases for ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy Sensor Devices . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS, ISBN 978-989-758-159-5, pages 263-270. DOI: 10.5220/0005643502630270


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icsports15,
author={Hans Weghorn},
title={Usability and Engineering Aspects of Competing RF Technologies for Communication with Commercial Sports Sensors in Ubiquitous Applications - Experimental Comparison of Power Consumption and Use Cases for ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy Sensor Devices},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,},
year={2015},
pages={263-270},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005643502630270},
isbn={978-989-758-159-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,
TI - Usability and Engineering Aspects of Competing RF Technologies for Communication with Commercial Sports Sensors in Ubiquitous Applications - Experimental Comparison of Power Consumption and Use Cases for ANT+ and Bluetooth Low Energy Sensor Devices
SN - 978-989-758-159-5
AU - Weghorn H.
PY - 2015
SP - 263
EP - 270
DO - 10.5220/0005643502630270