Automated Breast Mass Segmentation using Pulse-Coupled Neural Network and Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution: A Coarse-to-fine Approach

Songlin Du, Yaping Yan, Yide Ma

2016

Abstract

Motivation: Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) is an important means for the clinical detection of breast cancer. Mass is a common manifestation of breast cancer. This work aims to develop an effective breast mass segmentation algorithm for CAD systems. Method: On one hand, pulse-coupled neural network (PCNN) and level set (LS) method have complementary advantages in image segmentation, we therefore combine PCNN and LS. On the other hand, traditional LS method formulates the evolution of the contour through the evolution of a level set function (LSF), and LSF typically develops irregularities during its evolution, which may cause numerical errors and eventually destroy the stability of the evolution. So we use an improved LS model, named distance regularized level set evolution (DRLSE), to achieve desirable segmentation performance. Specifically, we extract the region of interest (ROI) with PCNN and sets initial contour for DRLSE first. Then the finely segmentation is achieved by DRLSE. Results: Both qualitative and quantitative experiments on three large-scale mammography databases prove that the proposed method achieves high segmentation accuracy. Conclusion: The proposed algorithm is effective for automatic breast mass segmentation. Significance: First, the sketchy position of mass is fixed by PCNN, which guides the algorithm to define a flexibly initial contour for DRLSE. This strategy makes it easier for the contour to move from initial position towards the boundary between mass and normal tissue. Second, the use of DRLSE, which introduces an intrinsic capability of maintaining regularity of the LSF, ensures stable LS evolution and achieves accurate segmentation.

References

  1. Arai, K., Abdullah, I. N., and Okumura, H. (2012). Automated detection method for clustered microcalcification in mammogram image based on statistical textural features. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., 3(5):12- 16.
  2. Astley, S. M. (2004). Computer-based detection and prompting of mammographic abnormalities. Br. J. Radiol., 45:S194-S200.
  3. Chen, Y., Park, S. K., Ma, Y., and Ala, R. (2011). A new automatic parameter setting method of a simplified pcnn for image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 22(6):880-892.
  4. Chen, Z., Strange, H., Oliver, A., Denton, E. R. E., Boggis, C., and Zwiggelaar, R. (2015). Topological modeling and classification of mammographic microcalcification clusters. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 62(4):1203- 1214.
  5. Cui, Y., Tan, Y., Zhao, B., Liberman, L., Parbhu, R., Kaplan, J., Theodoulou, M., Hudis, C., and Schwartz, L. H. (2009). Malignant lesion segmentation in contrast-enhanced breast mr images based on the marker-controlled watershed. Med. Phys., 36(10):4359-4369.
  6. Du, S., Wu, G., Ma, L., and Ma, Y. (2014). Maximum quantum entropy based optimal threshold selecting criterion for thresholding image segmentation. J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 10(8):3359-3366.
  7. Eckhorn, R., Reitboeck, H. J., Arndt, M., and Dicke, P. (1989). Feature linking via stimulus-evoked oscillations: experimental results from cat visual cortex and functional implications from a network model. In Proc. of the Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks, pages 723-730.
  8. Eckhorn, R., Reitboeck, H. J., Arndt, M., and Dicke, P. (1990). Feature linking via synchronization among distributed assemblies: Simulations of results from cat visual cortex. Neural Comput., 2(3):293-307.
  9. Eltonsy, N. H., Tourassi, G. D., and Elmaghraby, A. S. (2007). A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 26(6):880-889.
  10. Estellers, V., Zosso, D., Lai, R., Osher, S., Thiran, J.-P., and Bresson, X. (2012). Efficient algorithm for level set method preserving distance function. IEEE Trans. Image Process, 21(12):4722-4734.
  11. Guo, M., Dong, M., Wang, Z., Ma, Y., Guo, Y. (2015). A new method for mammographic mass segmentation based on parametric active contour model. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Wavelet Analysis and Pattern Recognition, pages 27-33.
  12. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Kegelmeyer, W. P., Moore, R., Chang, K., and MunishKumaran, S. (1998). Current status of the digital database for screening mammography. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 457-460.
  13. Heath, M., Bowyer, K., Kopans, D., Moore, R., and Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2001). The digital database for screening mammography. In Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 212-218.
  14. Kuntimad, G. and Ranganath, H. S. (1999). Perfect image segmentation using pulse coupled neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 10(3):591-598.
  15. Li, C., Xu, C., Gui, C., and Fox, M. D. (2010). Distance regularized level set evolution and its application to image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 19(12):3243-3254.
  16. Li, M., Cai, W., and Tan, Z. (2006). A region-based multisensor image fusion scheme using pulse-coupled neural network. Pattern Recogn. Lett., 27(16):1948-1956.
  17. Liang, X., Ramamohanarao, K., Frazer, H., and Yang, Q. (2012). Lesion segmentation in dynamic contrast enhanced mri of breast. In Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Digital Image Computing Techniques and Applications, pages 1-8.
  18. Moraru, L., Moldovanu, S., and Biswas, A. (2014). Optimization of breast lesion segmentation in texture feature space approach. Med. Eng. Phys., 36(1):129-135.
  19. Osher, S. and Sethian, J. A. (1988). Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: Algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations. J. Comput. Phys., 79(1):12-49.
  20. Rouhi, R., Jafari, M., Kasaei, S., and Keshavarzian, P. (2015). Benign and malignant breast tumors classification based on region growing and cnn segmentation. Expert Syst. Appl., 42(3):990-1002.
  21. Suckling, J., Parker, J., Dance, D. R., Astely, S., Hutt, I., Boggis, C. R. M., Ricketts, I., Stamatakis, E., Cerneaz, N., Kok, S.-L., Taylor, P., Betal, D., and Savage, J. (1994). The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database. In Proc. of the Int. Congress Series on Exerpta Medica, pages 375-378.
  22. Wang, Z., Ma, Y., Cheng, F., , and Yang, L. (2010). Review of pulse-coupled neural networks. Image and Vision Comput., 28(1):5-13.
  23. Wang, Z., Yu, G., Kang, Y., Zhao, Y., and Qu, Q. (2014). Breast tumor detection in digital mammography based on extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing, 128:175-184.
  24. Xian, M., Zhang, Y., and Cheng, H. D. (2015). Fully automatic segmentation of breast ultrasound images based on breast characteristics in space and frequency domains. Pattern Recognit., 48(2):485-497.
  25. Xie, W., Ma, Y., and Li, Y. (2015). Breast mass segmentation in digital mammography based on pulse coupled neural network and level set method. In Proc. of the Satellite Data Compression, Communications, and Processing XI, page 95010J.
  26. Xie, W., Li, Y., and Ma, Y. (2016). Breast mass classification in digital mammography based on extreme learning machine. Neurocomputing, 173:930-941.
  27. Zhang, L. and Ji, Q. (2011). A bayesian network model for automatic and interactive image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Image Process., 20(9):2582-2593.
  28. Zhou, L., Sun, Y., and Zheng, J. (2008). Automated color image edge detection using improved pcnn model. WSEAS Trans. Computers, 7(4):184-189.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Du S., Yan Y. and Ma Y. (2016). Automated Breast Mass Segmentation using Pulse-Coupled Neural Network and Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution: A Coarse-to-fine Approach . In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: BIOIMAGING, (BIOSTEC 2016) ISBN 978-989-758-170-0, pages 17-24. DOI: 10.5220/0005621300170024


in Bibtex Style

@conference{bioimaging16,
author={Songlin Du and Yaping Yan and Yide Ma},
title={Automated Breast Mass Segmentation using Pulse-Coupled Neural Network and Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution: A Coarse-to-fine Approach},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: BIOIMAGING, (BIOSTEC 2016)},
year={2016},
pages={17-24},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005621300170024},
isbn={978-989-758-170-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: BIOIMAGING, (BIOSTEC 2016)
TI - Automated Breast Mass Segmentation using Pulse-Coupled Neural Network and Distance Regularized Level Set Evolution: A Coarse-to-fine Approach
SN - 978-989-758-170-0
AU - Du S.
AU - Yan Y.
AU - Ma Y.
PY - 2016
SP - 17
EP - 24
DO - 10.5220/0005621300170024