Differences in Radiopacity Value of Rmgic, Gic and Composite Resin Materials with Secondary Caries using Conventional and Digital Radiography

Cek Dara Manja, Kholidina Imanda Harahap

2018

Abstract

Radiopacity is an important feature of the restorative material because the ability of the dentist differs in interpreting a lesion or caries on a radiograph. The purpose of this study is to determine the differences in radiopacity value of RMGIC, GIC and bulkfill composite resin materials with secondary caries as well as to evaluate the radiographic technique used to obtain the radiograph. This type of research is descriptive analytics by using comparative group design. The samples in this study were dental radiographs filled with RMGIC, GIC and bulkfill composite resin materials produced from conventional and digital radiographic sampling. Then conventional and digital radiographs are measured using Image J software to distinguish the respective radiopacity of restoration materials and secondary caries. Using RMGIC average restorative materials on conventional radiographs of 191,226 ± 17,908 and on digital radiographs of 187.490 ± 11.734. Using the average GIC restoration material on conventional radiographs of 191,063 ± 52,527 and on digital radiographs of 186,809 ± 15,663. Using a bulkfill resin composite resin on average radiopacity on a conventional radiograph of 177.960 ± 39.147 and on a digital radiograph of 192.293 ± 11.704. The mean secondary caries radiodencity on conventional radiographs was 195,651 ± 10,191 and the digital radiograph was 104,293 ± 15,114. Furthermore, the data were analyzed by using T test with significance value p <0,05. There was no significant difference in radiopacity value of RMGIC, GIC and bulkfill composite resin materials on secondary caries using conventional radiography. There are significant differences in the radiopacity value of RMGIC, GIC and bulkfill composite resin materials on secondary caries using digital radiography.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Manja C. and Harahap K. (2018). Differences in Radiopacity Value of Rmgic, Gic and Composite Resin Materials with Secondary Caries using Conventional and Digital Radiography.In Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches - Volume 1: ICOSTEERR, ISBN 978-989-758-449-7, pages 568-571. DOI: 10.5220/0010078505680571

in Bibtex Style

@conference{icosteerr18,
author={Cek Dara Manja and Kholidina Imanda Harahap},
title={Differences in Radiopacity Value of Rmgic, Gic and Composite Resin Materials with Secondary Caries using Conventional and Digital Radiography},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches - Volume 1: ICOSTEERR,},
year={2018},
pages={568-571},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0010078505680571},
isbn={978-989-758-449-7},
}

in EndNote Style

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference of Science, Technology, Engineering, Environmental and Ramification Researches - Volume 1: ICOSTEERR,
TI - Differences in Radiopacity Value of Rmgic, Gic and Composite Resin Materials with Secondary Caries using Conventional and Digital Radiography
SN - 978-989-758-449-7
AU - Manja C.
AU - Harahap K.
PY - 2018
SP - 568
EP - 571
DO - 10.5220/0010078505680571